MSA Standards & Regulations

Industry standards, regulatory requirements, and compliance guidance

Why Standards Matter

MSA standards provide consistent methodologies, acceptance criteria, and documentation requirements across industries and organizations.

Benefits of Following Standards
  • Consistent methodology across organizations
  • Regulatory compliance and customer acceptance
  • Reduced risk of measurement system failures
  • Improved supplier-customer communication
  • Legal protection and liability reduction
Compliance Considerations
  • Standards may have different acceptance criteria
  • Customer requirements may be more stringent
  • Regulatory requirements vary by industry
  • Documentation requirements differ
  • Regular updates and revisions occur

Automotive Industry Standards

AIAG MSA Manual (Primary Reference)
Automotive Industry Action Group - Measurement Systems Analysis
Key Requirements:
  • %GRR ≤ 10%: Acceptable for all applications
  • %GRR 10-30%: May be acceptable depending on application
  • %GRR > 30%: Unacceptable, system needs improvement
  • NDC ≥ 5: Adequate discrimination
  • Study design: 10 parts, 3 operators, 3 trials minimum
Study Types Covered:
  • Gage R&R (Variable and Attribute)
  • Bias studies
  • Linearity studies
  • Stability studies
  • Destructive testing approaches
Current Version: 4th Edition (2010) - Widely adopted across automotive supply chain
ISO/TS 16949 / IATF 16949
Quality Management Systems for Automotive Production
MSA Requirements:
  • Statistical studies required for measurement systems
  • Must demonstrate measurement system capability
  • Documentation of MSA studies required
  • Regular re-validation required
  • Risk-based approach to measurement system validation
Key Clauses:
  • 7.1.5 Monitoring and measuring resources
  • 8.3.4 Design and development controls
  • 8.5.1 Control of production
VDA Volume 5
German Automotive Industry Association - Capability of Measurement Systems

Alternative approach to AIAG MSA, commonly used in European automotive industry.

Key Differences from AIAG:
  • Uses Cg and Cgk indices instead of %GRR
  • Different acceptance criteria
  • Emphasis on process capability integration
Acceptance Criteria:
  • Cg ≥ 1.33: Capable measurement system
  • Cgk ≥ 1.33: Capable and unbiased

Medical Device Industry Standards

ISO 13485
Medical Devices - Quality Management Systems
MSA Requirements:
  • Measurement equipment validation required
  • Statistical evidence of measurement capability
  • Risk-based approach to measurement validation
  • Documentation and record keeping requirements
Typical Acceptance Criteria:
  • %GRR ≤ 20%: For critical safety characteristics
  • %GRR ≤ 30%: For non-critical characteristics
  • Risk assessment determines specific requirements
FDA 21 CFR Part 820
US FDA Quality System Regulation
Key Requirements:
  • §820.72: Inspection, measuring, and test equipment
  • Equipment must be suitable for intended use
  • Calibration and validation procedures required
  • Statistical evidence of measurement system capability
  • Documentation of validation studies
Note: FDA does not specify exact %GRR criteria but requires demonstration of measurement system suitability for intended use.

Aerospace Industry Standards

AS9100
Quality Management Systems - Aerospace
MSA Requirements:
  • Statistical validation of measurement systems
  • Risk-based approach to measurement system validation
  • Configuration management of measurement equipment
  • Traceability to national/international standards
Typical Acceptance Criteria:
  • %GRR ≤ 10%: For critical flight safety characteristics
  • %GRR ≤ 20%: For other critical characteristics
  • %GRR ≤ 30%: For non-critical characteristics
Related Standards:
  • AS9102: First Article Inspection
  • AS9003: Inspection System Assessment
  • AS9110: Maintenance Organizations

General International Standards

ISO 9001
Quality Management Systems - Requirements
MSA Requirements (Clause 7.1.5):
  • Monitoring and measuring resources must be suitable
  • Maintained to ensure continuing fitness for purpose
  • Retained documented information as evidence
Implementation Guidance:
  • Statistical validation recommended
  • Risk-based approach acceptable
  • Industry-specific standards often referenced
ISO 10012
Measurement Management Systems

Comprehensive standard for measurement management systems, including MSA requirements.

Key Elements:
  • Measurement process validation
  • Uncertainty evaluation
  • Measurement system monitoring
  • Continuous improvement
MSA Approach:
  • Emphasizes measurement uncertainty
  • Risk-based validation approach
  • Lifecycle management of measurement systems
ISO/IEC 17025
Testing and Calibration Laboratories
Laboratory MSA Requirements:
  • Method validation and verification
  • Measurement uncertainty evaluation
  • Proficiency testing and interlaboratory comparisons
  • Equipment validation and monitoring

Statistical Standards

ISO 5725 Series
Accuracy and Precision of Measurement Methods
  • Part 1: General principles and definitions
  • Part 2: Basic method for determination of repeatability and reproducibility
  • Part 3: Intermediate measures of precision
  • Part 4: Basic methods for determination of trueness
  • Part 5: Alternative methods for determination of precision
  • Part 6: Use in practice of accuracy values
ASTM E691
Interlaboratory Study to Determine Precision
  • Standard practice for conducting interlaboratory studies
  • Determination of precision of test methods
  • Statistical analysis procedures
  • Outlier detection and treatment
  • Reporting requirements

Compliance Implementation Guide

Step-by-Step Compliance
  1. Identify applicable standards
    • Industry-specific requirements
    • Customer specifications
    • Regulatory requirements
  2. Determine acceptance criteria
    • %GRR limits
    • NDC requirements
    • P/T ratio limits
  3. Plan and execute studies
    • Follow standard methodology
    • Document procedures
    • Maintain records
  4. Verify compliance
    • Compare results to criteria
    • Document compliance
    • Plan re-validation
Documentation Requirements
Typical Documentation:
  • MSA study protocol
  • Raw measurement data
  • Statistical analysis results
  • Acceptance criteria and rationale
  • Conclusions and recommendations
  • Approval signatures
  • Re-validation schedule
Record Retention:
  • Follow industry requirements
  • Typically 3-10 years
  • Electronic records acceptable
  • Backup and recovery procedures

Quick Reference: Acceptance Criteria by Industry

Industry Standard %GRR Excellent %GRR Marginal %GRR Unacceptable NDC Minimum
Automotive AIAG MSA < 10% 10-30% > 30% ≥ 5
Medical Device (Critical) ISO 13485 < 10% 10-20% > 20% ≥ 5
Aerospace (Critical) AS9100 < 10% 10-20% > 20% ≥ 5
General Manufacturing ISO 9001 < 10% 10-30% > 30% ≥ 5
Laboratory Testing ISO/IEC 17025 Based on measurement uncertainty requirements N/A
Important: Always verify current standard requirements and customer specifications, as criteria may vary based on specific applications and risk assessments.

Next Steps

Follow Our Guide
Study Guide
Use Our Tool
Try Tool
Get Help
Browse FAQ
Learn More
Learning Hub